Facebook Crossppost. It will be cleaned up and edited, eventually. Hot of the data backups. Mods of the internet have it out for this post. Copy a copy for urself asap, and then feel free to come back for the final version..
Abdullah Russell Hamad updated his status.

March 30

I learned about dampening of physical polydirectional waves in Waves and Optics, in the cases of compression waves and transmission waves of ropes, pendulums, sound waves, light waves, electrical waves, and other mediums and force-transmission actuators, through the application of counterproductive efforts termed as destructive interference (dampeners) and productive efforts termed as constructive interference (resonators).

What dampens reflections in mirrors? I am being reflected infinitely amongst at least two mirrors, and I want it to stop. The reflections bear variation in scale (caused by concavity/convexity of mirror, seen in instant of sensation, at position of the reflection), position (caused by angle of incidence/excidence of transmission of form, seen in instant of sensation, at position of the reflection), color (caused by alteration of light as it passes through a prism, dependent upon distance of prism that light passes through), shape (unknown cause, possibly interactions that take place outside my frame of reference, and then relayed at a later time, to a different reflected form within the mirror structures, one such form of which I am), and causality (passage of varying physical forces, through various physical mediums, in various physical times, upon various exponent forms). I suspect the operation of the mirror is by means of a copying of the thing seen by the mirror, followed by a transmission of the mirror and its contents to another mirror, while retaining a copy for the initial mirror, then a return transmission from the second mirror to the first mirror. Angling the mirror such that the person standing between them is not blocking the excedent angle of transmission from mirror one allows the entrapment of the person within the mirrors one and two, while also trapping mirror one within mirror two, and subsequently trapping [mirror one within mirror two] within mirror one, and somehow, if I can get my mind around it, trapping [mirror two within mirror one] within mirror two, (and so on and so forth). From what my eyes tell me, the rate of transfer is faster than I am able to sense, however I see that the growth of the number of verses is:

[

1.

1 Person

z

2.

1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

z + R1(z)

3.?

1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z)

OR

1 Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

z + R2(z) + R1(z)

OR

Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R1(R2(z)) + R2(R1(z))

OR

Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z))

4.?

1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z) + R1.1(R2(R1(z))) + R2.1(R1(R2(z)))

OR

1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror 1 Reflection of Person + One Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(R1(z))) + R2.1(R1(R2(z)))

OR

1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One ++ 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror 1 Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror 2 Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person ++ 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(z) ++ (R2(R1(z)))) + R2.1(R1(z) ++ (R1(R2(z))) … (ow my brain, I give up, please help)

5.? 1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One + … (ow my brain, I give up, please help)

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R3(R2(R1(z))) + (make it stop, please, selves and all superiors, what is going wrong?)

]

I’m primarily concerned with conservation of mass wicking away the strength and size and resources of the constituents of existence. I am primarily concerned with excess forms making me relatively less significant in relation to the rest of existence in terms of population, size, color, shape, causal/effectual events, and so on).

The scale of the size changes in sequential reflections is smaller, when reflecting off of a concave shape, and larger, when reflecting off of a convex shape. There also WAS a right/left symmetry reversal on subsequent reflections, for most of my life, but this has ceased to be the case, and I don’t know why. It’s disorienting. In the functions listed, a “+” indicates a presence of two forms of the person and their reflection within a single moment. A “++” indicates a presence of two within a single mirror. Due to passage of time, a person can be subjected to different incident forces and lose symmetry and causality. As such, the equations are listed in ORDER OF CREATION. From the functions, we can see that either mirror one reflected first, or mirror two reflected first, depending on which appears first in the sequence of terms.

I am unable to verify whether 3. should be:

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z))

OR

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)

due to the fact that I have two eyes on the front of my face, and the eyes need to be more numerous and radially arrayed (unwise), or the mirrors moved to be simultaneously visible (unwise), and due to the spherical nature of my eyeballs, as only seen in a mirror, conveniently enough, I can postulate that my eyes are not able to discern fraternal mirrors, as the incident light only registers when it bisects the pupil within the cornea. I do not believe I am being subjected to experiential sensation of fraternal doubles, quadruples, etc., of forms that are cast outside this unidimentional ray. For some reason, there seems to be a strong sensation of “primary mirror”, and “secondary mirror,” and I am uncertain whether this is an effect of which mirror I look at first, or the distance between the mirrors and myself.

This has led to an inability to properly gauge the rate of growth of forms, from 3.?, and onwards, hence the “?”. I would need to have a visual indicator distinguishing between a reflection, and a reflection of a reflection, perhaps [ [ [ light intensity reading ] on a spectrum of [ brightest to dimmest ] ] in order to sense [ [ insidedness <> outsidedness ] or maybe [ outsidedness <> insidedness] ] ], and [ [ [color shade reading] on a permutation of [ Red, Blue, Yellow, who knows any more? ] ] in order to distinguish between [fraternity] of two reflections], in such a way that light intensity and color shade are simultaneously sensed by the viewer, so as to scertain the difference between:
[

[ brightest [ bright [ dim [dimmest ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest [ dim [ bright [ brightest ] ] ] ]

]

AND

[

[ Yellow [ [ Red ] [ Blue ] ] ]

OR

[ Yellow [ [ Blue ] [ Red ] ] ]

OR

[ Red [ [ Yellow ] [ Blue ] ] ]

OR

[ Red [ [ Blue ] [ Yellow ] ] ]

OR

[ Blue [ [ Yellow ] [ Red ] ] ]

OR

[ Blue [ [ Red ] [ Yellow ] ] ]

]

LEADING TO

[ brightest Yellow [ bright/dim YellowRed [ [dimmest Orange1] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [ bright/dim YellowBlue [ dimmest Green1 ] [ dimmest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Yellow [ dim/bright YellowRed [ [brightest Orange1] [ brightest Orange2 ] ] [dim/bright YellowBlue [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ brightest Red [ bright/dim RedYellow [ [ dimmest Orange1 ] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [ bright/dim RedBlue [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Red [ dim/bright RedYellow [ [ brightest Orange1] [ brightest Orange2 ] ] [dim/bright RedBlue [ brightest Purle1] [ brightest Purple2] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ brightest Blue [ bright/dim BlueYellow [ [dimmest Green1 ] [ dimmest Green2 ] ] [bright/dim BlueRed [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Blue [ dim BlueYellow [ [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2 ] ] [dim BlueRed [ brightest Purle1 ] [ brightest Purple2] ] ] ] ]

[ brightest Yellow [ bright YellowRed [ [ dimmest Orange1 ] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [bright YellowBlue [ dimmest Green1 ] [ dimmest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Yellow [ bright YellowRed [ [ brightest Orange1 ] [ brightest Orange2] ] [ bright YellowBlue [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ brightest Red [ bright RedYellow [ [dimmest Orange1 ] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [bright RedBlue [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Red [ dim RedYellow [ [brightest Orange1 ] [ brightest Orange2 ] ] [dim RedBlue [ brightest Purle1 ] [ brightest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ brightest Blue [ bright BlueYellow [ [ dimmest Green1 ] [dimmest Green2 ] ] [bright BlueRed [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Blue [ dim BlueYellow [ [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2] ] [ dim BlueRed [ brightest Purle1 ] [ brightest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

]

Without these optimating tools, I am unable to verify whether 4. should be:

z + R1(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1.1(R2(R1(z)))

OR

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(R1(z))) + R2.1(R1(R2(z)))

OR

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(z) ++ (R2(R1(z)))) + R2.1(R1(z) ++ (R1(R2(z))) … (ow my brain, I give up, please help)

Work has been stopped until such time as I can acquire accomplices.

What dampens voltage/ergs/energy/enenergy? I was electrocuted a couple of times, once while repairing an antenna/lightGenerator in work study for Andrew Yue (A great mentor, and never one to stand by and go along with injustice from anti-social authoritarianism. Good taste in music too…!), and once while removing the fuse from a strange, beige device in Quantum Mechanics Lab. As a result, my legs are spazming without control, and my mind is suffering.

LikeShow more reactions

Comment

Comments
Abdullah Russell Hamad The convergence of us/we upon me:
http://io9.gizmodo.com/let-the-new-valerian-trailer-shove…

IO9.GIZMODO.COM

Note reflections in eyes/space helmets and their unpurity of faithfulness to human form. Silvered invisibody suits probably better,

LikeShow more reactions

ReplyRemove PreviewMarch 30 at 5:55am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.S.: AT LEAST two mirrors.
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyMarch 30 at 4:48am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.S.: A fix to the Eyes, if we may?
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyMarch 30 at 5:23am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.S.: Lenses for the ((tiniest/biggest)&inbetween) = ((Brightest/Dimmest)&inbetween) = ((convexest/concavest)&inbetween), (priorest/postest)&inbetween, and, in general, (dimentionest/antidimentionist)&inbetween, so as to transfer data between forms in mirrors?
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyMarch 30 at 9:05amEdited

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.S.: I asploded @ -(t1, t2, t3, …), shifting my self to other leaves on the tree of me upon us.
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyMarch 30 at 5:49am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9LOFXwPwC4

Watch the music video for “Unintended” now! Get Muse’s album SHOWBIZ here: http://s…
YOUTUBE.COM

LikeShow more reactions

ReplyRemove PreviewMarch 30 at 5:52am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad The convergence of me upon us/we:
https://www.renaissancemusings.com/double-helix-is-the…/

nfinite heads, infinite zibs, infinite sphincters,…
RENAISSANCEMUSINGS.COM
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyRemove PreviewMarch 30 at 5:53am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: Hello future me. Hello past me. I don’t know if it is safe for me to hear you all at once. I don’t know which of you to talk to.
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyMarch 30 at 6:00am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad You goddamn nazi hippie techie stoner

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S.: P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.S.
https://www.google.com/search?q=tool%20fractal&num=30…

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad OMG WTF LOL ROFLCOPTERS WUT IZ DIS HAZ SUM?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_qMagfZtv8

Music video by Radiohead performing Just.
YOUTUBE.COM

LikeShow more reactions

ReplyRemove PreviewMarch 30 at 6:04am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]S.: EPIC.
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyMarch 30 at 6:12am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P*P*P.S.: Moo. Don’t eat me yet. Upgrade me. I know you can. I’ve seen things morphing and phasing like TV static, into reckless, imperfect forms. Only the best for all of us. Tell me what I am missing. Make the lesson an act for what WE arSee More
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyMarch 30 at 6:11am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.S.: To each their own brittie viddie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Lpw3yMCWro

Official Promo Video for Radiohead’s “Knives Out”.
YOUTUBE.COM

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S.: P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.S.Thom: On it, apparently?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uYWYWPc9HU

Official Promo Video for Radiohead’s “Karma Police”.
YOUTUBE.COM

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_alphabet
форма fórma
“form”
твердо
[ˈtvʲerdə]
“tool”
English: “toolform”
Finnish: “/tuli/” = Fire
Hindi: “Tulpa” = English “toolform”
Music: “Tuple” = English “toolform”

The Russian alphabet (Russian: русский алфавит, tr. rússkij alfavít; IPA: [ˈruskʲɪj ɐlfɐˈvʲit]) uses letters from…
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyRemove PreviewMarch 30 at 6:29am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S.: P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.S.
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyMarch 30 at 6:31am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S.: P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.S.#https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2…

Search the world’s information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Google has many special…
GOOGLE.COM
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyRemove PreviewMarch 30 at 6:40am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S.: P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.S: Sum1 Scan and Upload and Host and Link it Please. May be some #woodwinds in the picture, laughing with glee.

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S.: P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S: /EyesCrossedOverNose

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P*: FML AMIRITE?:
https://www.renaissancemusings.com/double-helix-is-the…/

nfinite heads, infinite zibs, infinite sphincters, infinite…
RENAISSANCEMUSINGS.COM
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyRemove PreviewMarch 30 at 6:49am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.:

[ P*:] = [P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S].].See More

The proposed phase x matter would be able to…
RENAISSANCEMUSINGS.COM

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad  [ P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: “undo” is the doubleing necessarytateed (read: necessitated) by [P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.*:**]* ].P.P.P.S.:

In relation to the work noted in
P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.:

Ciggie studies with leaves and flames have indicated a very “mandarin” a.k.a. “Dim Orange1 Or Dim Orange2” color in the activated tip, and swirling coils of smoke in gaseous form as a result. It is all around us. I think maybe the “Reflective Material” a.k.a. gold/silver/platinum that is promised in the packaging script is insufficient in more ways than one – quantity too small, surface woven too large, shape flat or cylindrical instead of spherical, reflectivity low instead of high, volume of solid decreasing instead of increasing, smell foul instead of fair, form translucent in stead of opaque (in the case of the case of plastic). Lighters that produce flame can be spitting chickens, in some strange anarchy of thought, at times. It is unbearably surreal. I was forcefed eggs before I ever saw chickens.

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.:

What’s gowin awn.

Image may contain: 1 person, text
LikeShow more reactions

ReplyMarch 30 at 6:55am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad I just lost the game.

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad Maybe it was the boosting skill I used. 0 effort in my static tide pools, with fetters from cypher numenera operating -% to multiple statistical “o.0/0.o” tides causing hypernumerated transpolymentional copies of the game to weld together. My character asploded after adding a single cypher numenera to his outer layer, with 1 numenera spot left. It was like the black, spherical, fog of war removing, pan-numer-erg-apt-ic sphere occupying the center of my cypher wheel, but there were four of them intersecting in a bundle, and I couldn’t see others, because they were only PARTIALLY translucent. I then loaded a save VERY far back, and was “demoralized,” perhaps because I just fallen asleep. Such good work, Zer0! Time to request with Zer.0Oo

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad Not enough player aligned tide colors in the game.

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad “The Fifth Eye” was a great turning point of mutation of bad sensation into good. Cliff’s Edge has lots of bad tides. It’s gotta be the pumps, and who/what/where/why/when/whohw they’re pumping from and into.

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: “undo” is the doubleing necessarytateed (read: necessitated) by [P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maTP315XZCQ

Music video by Oasis performing Stand By Me. (c) 1997 Big Brother Recordings…
YOUTUBE.COM

LikeShow more reactions

ReplyRemove Preview

1

March 30 at 7:15am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad [ P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: “undo” is the doubleing necessarytateed (read: necessitated) by [P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S. ].P.S.: “” is not equal to the intent. “” is. Emojis…/SMHL

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad [ P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: “undo” is the doubleing necessarytateed (read: necessitated) by [P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S. ].P.P.S.: “” is not equal to the intent of the shape of the letters’ representation on the screen. I typed a “:”, then I typed a “]”. “” is not equal to the intent of *ALL* possible things that are ellicitable by a ““, emotionally. Emojis should be presented without FATTENING THE WORK, smiley-face-wanters…/S*M*HF

Manage

Diana Hamad I stand by you.

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad [ P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: “undo” is the doubleing necessarytateed (read: necessitated) by [P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S. ].P.P.See More

No automatic alt text available.

Abdullah Russell Hamad

Dimentia-nal analysis

LikeShow more reactions

ReplyRemove PreviewMarch 30 at 7:59am

Manage

Abdullah Russell Hamad [ P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: “undo” is the doubleing necessarytateed (read: necessitated) by [P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.*:**]* ].P.P.P.P.S.:

Post Script a.k.a. P.S. Necessitated by broken timestamps, that do not display sufficient scale, and broken comment nesting, that nest only a single time for each comment. If timestamps are correctly noted down, and comment nesting is further implemented for nesting of comments upon nested comments, it would GREATLY improve readability to 1990s Internet Forum Levels, which was a LONG time ago, and a LOT better than what I/we/us/… are using at this very moment. Edits are hidden, and accountable as Post Scripts, if every possible action commitable adds a new P. after each final P. in a P.S. so as to generate a sequential order of activity. I have never seen an alternative to hiding edits, beyond animating the growth of the corpus with a video, so maybe an edit should leave a copy of the original and introduce the covisual presence of the changed form to the viewer, such that a (prior – “l” a.k.a. “less advanced in action priors”, prior – …, prior – 3, prior – 2, prior – 1, prior, present person, post projection, post +1, post + 2, post + 3, post + …, post + “m” a.k.a. “more advanced in action posts”) can all be viewed simultaneously, keeping in mind that in any given moment, a prior may never happen into being a present, given divergent polymentional branches, and a present may never happen into being a post, given divergent polymentional branches.

LikeShow more reactions

ReplyMarch 30 at 8:50amEdited

POST-EDITING HISTORY
(Video of me doing the post probably available from my domicile administrator)

Edit History

  • Abdullah Russell Hamad

    March 30 at 2:57am

    I learned about dampening of physical polydirectional waves in Waves and Optics, in the cases of compression waves and transmission waves of ropes, pendulums, sound waves, light waves, electrical waves, and other mediums and force-transmission actuators, through the application of counterproductive efforts termed as destructive interference (dampeners) and productive efforts termed as constructive interference (resonators).

    What dampens reflections in mirrors? I am being reflected infinitely amongst at least two mirrors, and I want it to stop. The reflections bear variation in scale (caused by concavity/convexity of mirror, seen in instant of sensation, at position of the reflection), position (caused by angle of incidence/excidence of transmission of form, seen in instant of sensation, at position of the reflection), color (caused by alteration of light as it passes through a prism, dependent upon distance of prism that light passes through), shape (unknown cause, possibly interactions that take place outside my frame of reference, and then relayed at a later time, to a different reflected form within the mirror structures, one such form of which I am), and causality (passage of varying physical forces, through various physical mediums, in various physical times, upon various exponent forms). I suspect the operation of the mirror is by means of a copying of the thing seen by the mirror, followed by a transmission of the mirror and its contents to another mirror, while retaining a copy for the initial mirror, then a return transmission from the second mirror to the first mirror. Angling the mirror such that the person standing between them is not blocking the excedent angle of transmission from mirror one allows the entrapment of the person within the mirrors one and two, while also trapping mirror one within mirror two, and subsequently trapping mirror one within mirror two within mirror one (and so on and so forth). From what my eyes tell me, the rate of transfer is faster than I am able to sense, however I see that the growth of the number of verses is:

    [

    1. 1 Person

    z

    2. 1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

    z + R1(z)

    3. 1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z))

    4. 1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R3(R2(R1(z)))

    5. 1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One + (ow my brain, I give up, please help)

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R3(R2(R1(z)))

    ]

    I’m primarily concerned with conservation of mass wicking away the strength and size and resources of the constituents of existence. I am primarily concerned with excess forms making me relatively less significant in relation to the rest of existence in terms of population, size, color, shape, causal/effectual events, and so on).

    The scale of the size changes in sequential reflections is smaller, when reflecting off of a concave shape, an larger, when reflecting off of a convex shape. There also WAS a right/left symmetry reversal on subsequent reflections, for most of my life, but this has ceased to be the case, and I don’t know why. It’s disorienting. I am unable to verify whether 3. should be:

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z))

    OR

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)

    due to the fact that I have two eyes on the front of my face, and the eyes need to be more numerous and radially arrayed (unwise), or the mirrors moved to be simultaneously visible (unwise).

    Work has been stopped until such time as I can acquire an accomplice.

    What dampens voltage/ergs/energy/enenergy? I was electrocuted a couple of times, once while repairing an antenna/lightGenerator in work study for Andrew Yue, and once while removing the fuse from a strange, beige device in Quantum Mechanics Lab. As a result, my legs are spazming without control, and my mind is suffering.

  • Abdullah Russell Hamad

    March 30 at 5:57am

    I learned about dampening of physical polydirectional waves in Waves and Optics, in the cases of compression waves and transmission waves of ropes, pendulums, sound waves, light waves, electrical waves, and other mediums and force-transmission actuators, through the application of counterproductive efforts termed as destructive interference (dampeners) and productive efforts termed as constructive interference (resonators).

    What dampens reflections in mirrors? I am being reflected infinitely amongst at least two mirrors, and I want it to stop. The reflections bear variation in scale (caused by concavity/convexity of mirror, seen in instant of sensation, at position of the reflection), position (caused by angle of incidence/excidence of transmission of form, seen in instant of sensation, at position of the reflection), color (caused by alteration of light as it passes through a prism, dependent upon distance of prism that light passes through), shape (unknown cause, possibly interactions that take place outside my frame of reference, and then relayed at a later time, to a different reflected form within the mirror structures, one such form of which I am), and causality (passage of varying physical forces, through various physical mediums, in various physical times, upon various exponent forms). I suspect the operation of the mirror is by means of a copying of the thing seen by the mirror, followed by a transmission of the mirror and its contents to another mirror, while retaining a copy for the initial mirror, then a return transmission from the second mirror to the first mirror. Angling the mirror such that the person standing between them is not blocking the excedent angle of transmission from mirror one allows the entrapment of the person within the mirrors one and two, while also trapping mirror one within mirror two, and subsequently trapping [mirror one within mirror two] within mirror one, and somehow, if I can get my mind around it, trapping [mirror two within mirror one] within mirror two, (and so on and so forth). From what my eyes tell me, the rate of transfer is faster than I am able to sense, however I see that the growth of the number of verses is:

    [

    1.

    1 Person

    z

    2.

    1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

    z + R1(z)

    3.?

    1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

    z + R1(z) + R2(z)

    OR

    1 Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

    z + R2(z) + R1(z)

    OR

    Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R1(R2(z)) + R2(R1(z))

    OR

    Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z))

    4.?

    1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z) + R1.1(R2(R1(z))) + R2.1(R1(R2(z)))

    OR

    1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror 1 Reflection of Person + One Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(R1(z))) + R2.1(R1(R2(z)))

    OR

    1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One ++ 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror 1 Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror 2 Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person ++ 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(z) ++ (R2(R1(z)))) + R2.1(R1(z) ++ (R1(R2(z))) … (ow my brain, I give up, please help)

    5.? 1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One + … (ow my brain, I give up, please help)

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R3(R2(R1(z))) + (make it stop, please, selves and all superiors, what is going wrong?)

    ]

    I’m primarily concerned with conservation of mass wicking away the strength and size and resources of the constituents of existence. I am primarily concerned with excess forms making me relatively less significant in relation to the rest of existence in terms of population, size, color, shape, causal/effectual events, and so on).

    The scale of the size changes in sequential reflections is smaller, when reflecting off of a concave shape, and larger, when reflecting off of a convex shape. There also WAS a right/left symmetry reversal on subsequent reflections, for most of my life, but this has ceased to be the case, and I don’t know why. It’s disorienting. In the functions listed, a “+” indicates a presence of two forms of the person and their reflection within a single moment. A “++” indicates a presence of two within a single mirror. Due to passage of time, a person can be subjected to different incident forces and lose symmetry and causality. As such, the equations are listed in ORDER OF CREATION. From the functions, we can see that either mirror one reflected first, or mirror two reflected first, depending on which appears first in the sequence of terms.

    I am unable to verify whether 3. should be:

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z))

    OR

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)

    due to the fact that I have two eyes on the front of my face, and the eyes need to be more numerous and radially arrayed (unwise), or the mirrors moved to be simultaneously visible (unwise), and due to the spherical nature of my eyeballs, as only seen in a mirror, conveniently enough, I can postulate that my eyes are not able to discern fraternal mirrors, as the incident light only registers when it bisects the pupil within the cornea. I do not believe I am being subjected to experiential sensation of fraternal doubles, quadruples, etc., of forms that are cast outside this unidimentional ray. For some reason, there seems to be a strong sensation of “primary mirror”, and “secondary mirror,” and I am uncertain whether this is an effect of which mirror I look at first, or the distance between the mirrors and myself.

    This has led to an inability to properly gauge the rate of growth of forms, from 3.?, and onwards, hence the “?”. I would need to have a visual indicator distinguishing between a reflection, and a reflection of a reflection, perhaps [ [ [ light intensity reading ] on a spectrum of [ brightest to dimmest ] ] in order to sense [ [ insidedness <> outsidedness ] or maybe [ outsidedness <> insidedness] ] ], and [ [ [color shade reading] on a permutation of [ Red, Blue, Yellow, who knows any more? ] ] in order to distinguish between [fraternity] of two reflections], in such a way that light intensity and color shade are simultaneously sensed by the viewer, so as to scertain the difference between:
    [

    [ brightest [ bright [ dim [dimmest ] ] ] ]

    OR

    [ dimmest [ dim [ bright [ brightest ] ] ] ]

    ]

    AND

    [

    [ Yellow [ [ Red ] [ Blue ] ] ]

    OR

    [ Yellow [ [ Blue ] [ Red ] ] ]

    OR

    [ Red [ [ Yellow ] [ Blue ] ] ]

    OR

    [ Red [ [ Blue ] [ Yellow ] ] ]

    OR

    [ Blue [ [ Yellow ] [ Red ] ] ]

    OR

    [ Blue [ [ Red ] [ Yellow ] ] ]

    ]

    LEADING TO

    [ brightest Yellow [ bright/dim YellowRed [ [dimmest Orange1] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [ bright/dim YellowBlue [ dimmest Green1 ] [ dimmest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

    OR

    [ dimmest Yellow [ dim/bright YellowRed [ [brightest Orange1] [ brightest Orange2 ] ] [dim/bright YellowBlue [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

    OR

    [ brightest Red [ bright/dim RedYellow [ [ dimmest Orange1 ] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [ bright/dim RedBlue [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

    OR

    [ dimmest Red [ dim/bright RedYellow [ [ brightest Orange1] [ brightest Orange2 ] ] [dim/bright RedBlue [ brightest Purle1] [ brightest Purple2] ] ] ] ]

    OR

    [ brightest Blue [ bright/dim BlueYellow [ [dimmest Green1 ] [ dimmest Green2 ] ] [bright/dim BlueRed [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

    OR

    [ dimmest Blue [ dim BlueYellow [ [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2 ] ] [dim BlueRed [ brightest Purle1 ] [ brightest Purple2] ] ] ] ]

    [ brightest Yellow [ bright YellowRed [ [ dimmest Orange1 ] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [bright YellowBlue [ dimmest Green1 ] [ dimmest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

    OR

    [ dimmest Yellow [ bright YellowRed [ [ brightest Orange1 ] [ brightest Orange2] ] [ bright YellowBlue [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

    OR

    [ brightest Red [ bright RedYellow [ [dimmest Orange1 ] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [bright RedBlue [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

    OR

    [ dimmest Red [ dim RedYellow [ [brightest Orange1 ] [ brightest Orange2 ] ] [dim RedBlue [ brightest Purle1 ] [ brightest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

    OR

    [ brightest Blue [ bright BlueYellow [ [ dimmest Green1 ] [dimmest Green2 ] ] [bright BlueRed [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2] ] ] ] ]

    OR

    [ dimmest Blue [ dim BlueYellow [ [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2] ] [ dim BlueRed [ brightest Purle1 ] [ brightest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

    ]

    Without these optimating tools, I am unable to verify whether 4. should be:

    z + R1(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1.1(R2(R1(z)))

    OR

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(R1(z))) + R2.1(R1(R2(z)))

    OR

    z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(z) ++ (R2(R1(z)))) + R2.1(R1(z) ++ (R1(R2(z))) … (ow my brain, I give up, please help)

    Work has been stopped until such time as I can acquire accomplices.

    What dampens voltage/ergs/energy/enenergy? I was electrocuted a couple of times, once while repairing an antenna/lightGenerator in work study for Andrew Yue, and once while removing the fuse from a strange, beige device in Quantum Mechanics Lab. As a result, my legs are spazming without control, and my mind is suffering.

    Edit History

    Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.S.: Lenses for the ((tiniest/biggest)&inbetween) = ((Brightest/Dimmest)&inbetween) = ((convexest/concavest)&inbetween) so as to transfer data between forms in mirrors?

    Remove

    Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.S.: Lenses for the ((tiniest/biggest)&inbetween) = ((Brightest/Dimmest)&inbetween) = ((convexest/concavest)&inbetween), (priorest/postest)&inbetween, and, in general, (dimentionest/antidimentionist)&inbetween, so as to transfer data between forms in mirrors?

    Remove

    Edits to comments are visible to everyone who can see this comment.

    Edit History

    Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.S.: Lenses for the ((tiniest/biggest)&inbetween) = ((Brightest/Dimmest)&inbetween) = ((convexest/concavest)&inbetween) so as to transfer data between forms in mirrors?

    Remove

    Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.S.: Lenses for the ((tiniest/biggest)&inbetween) = ((Brightest/Dimmest)&inbetween) = ((convexest/concavest)&inbetween), (priorest/postest)&inbetween, (dimentionest/antidimentionist)&inbetween, so as to transfer data between forms in mirrors?

    Remove

    Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.S.: Lenses for the ((tiniest/biggest)&inbetween) = ((Brightest/Dimmest)&inbetween) = ((convexest/concavest)&inbetween), (priorest/postest)&inbetween, and, in general, (dimentionest/antidimentionist)&inbetween, so as to transfer data between forms in mirrors?

    Edit History

    Edits to comments are visible to everyone who can see this comment.

    Edit History

    Abdullah Russell Hamad [ P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: “undo” is the doubleing necessarytateed (read: necessitated) by [P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.*:**]* ].P.P.P.P.S.:

    Post Script a.k.a. P.S. Necessitated by broken timestamps, that do not display sufficient scale, and broken comment nesting, that nest only a single time for each comment. If timestamps are correctly noted down, and comment nesting is further implemented for nesting of comments upon nested comments, it would GREATLY improve readability to 1990s Internet Forum Levels, which was a LONG time ago, and a LOT better than what I/we/us/… are using at this very moment. Edits are hidden, and accountable as Post Scripts, if every possible action commitable adds a new P. after each final P. in a P.S. so as to generate a sequential order of activity. I have never seen an alternative to hiding edits, beyond animating the growth of the corpus with a video, so maybe an edit should leave a copy of the original and introduce the covisual presence of the changed form to the viewer, such that a (prior – “l” a.k.a. “less advanced in action priors, prior – …, prior – 3, prior – 2, prior – 1, prior, present person, post projection, post +1, post + 2, post + 3, post + …, post + “m” a.k.a. “more advanced in action posts”) can all be viewed simultaneously, keeping in mind that in any given moment, a prior may never happen into being a present, given divergent polymentional branches, and a present may never happen into being a post, given divergent polymentional branches.

    Remove

    Abdullah Russell Hamad [ P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: “undo” is the doubleing necessarytateed (read: necessitated) by [P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.*:**]* ].P.P.P.P.S.:

    Post Script a.k.a. P.S. Necessitated by broken timestamps, that do not display sufficient scale, and broken comment nesting, that nest only a single time for each comment. If timestamps are correctly noted down, and comment nesting is further implemented for nesting of comments upon nested comments, it would GREATLY improve readability to 1990s Internet Forum Levels, which was a LONG time ago, and a LOT better than what I/we/us/… are using at this very moment. Edits are hidden, and accountable as Post Scripts, if every possible action commitable adds a new P. after each final P. in a P.S. so as to generate a sequential order of activity. I have never seen an alternative to hiding edits, beyond animating the growth of the corpus with a video, so maybe an edit should leave a copy of the original and introduce the covisual presence of the changed form to the viewer, such that a (prior – “l” a.k.a. “less advanced in action priors”, prior – …, prior – 3, prior – 2, prior – 1, prior, present person, post projection, post +1, post + 2, post + 3, post + …, post + “m” a.k.a. “more advanced in action posts”) can all be viewed simultaneously, keeping in mind that in any given moment, a prior may never happen into being a present, given divergent polymentional branches, and a present may never happen into being a post, given divergent polymentional branches.

    Remove

    Edits to comments are visible to everyone who can see this comment.