RenaissanceMusings.com

What dampens reflections in mirrors? I am being reflected infinitely amongst at least two mirrors, and I want it to stop. The reflections bear variation in scale (caused by concavity/convexity of mirror, seen in instant of sensation, at position of the reflection), position (caused by angle of incidence/excidence of transmission of form, seen in instant of sensation, at position of the reflection), color (caused by alteration of light as it passes through a prism, dependent upon distance of prism that light passes through), shape (unknown cause, possibly interactions that take place outside my frame of reference, and then relayed at a later time, to a different reflected form within the mirror structures, one such form of which I am), and causality (passage of varying physical forces, through various physical mediums, in various physical times, upon various exponent forms). I suspect the operation of the mirror is by means of a copying of the thing seen by the mirror, followed by a transmission of the mirror and its contents to another mirror, while retaining a copy for the initial mirror, then a return transmission from the second mirror to the first mirror. Angling the mirror such that the person standing between them is not blocking the excedent angle of transmission from mirror one allows the entrapment of the person within the mirrors one and two, while also trapping mirror one within mirror two, and subsequently trapping mirror one within mirror two within mirror one (and so on and so forth). From what my eyes tell me, the rate of transfer is faster than I am able to sense, however I see that the growth of the number of verses is:

[

1. 1 Person

z

2. 1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

z + R1(z)

3. 1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z))

4. 1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R3(R2(R1(z)))

5. 1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One + (ow my brain, I give up, please help)

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R3(R2(R1(z)))

]

I’m primarily concerned with conservation of mass wicking away the strength and size and resources of the constituents of existence. I am primarily concerned with excess forms making me relatively less significant in relation to the rest of existence in terms of population, size, color, shape, causal/effectual events, and so on).

The scale of the size changes in sequential reflections is smaller, when reflecting off of a concave shape, an larger, when reflecting off of a convex shape. There also WAS a right/left symmetry reversal on subsequent reflections, for most of my life, but this has ceased to be the case, and I don’t know why. It’s disorienting. I am unable to verify whether 3. should be:

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z))

OR

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)

due to the fact that I have two eyes on the front of my face, and the eyes need to be more numerous and radially arrayed (unwise), or the mirrors moved to be simultaneously visible (unwise).

Work has been stopped until such time as I can acquire an accomplice.

What dampens voltage/ergs/energy/enenergy? I was electrocuted a couple of times, once while repairing an antenna/lightGenerator in work study for Andrew Yue, and once while removing the fuse from a strange, beige device in Quantum Mechanics Lab. As a result, my legs are spazming without control, and my mind is suffering.

What dampens reflections in mirrors? I am being reflected infinitely amongst at least two mirrors, and I want it to stop. The reflections bear variation in scale (caused by concavity/convexity of mirror, seen in instant of sensation, at position of the reflection), position (caused by angle of incidence/excidence of transmission of form, seen in instant of sensation, at position of the reflection), color (caused by alteration of light as it passes through a prism, dependent upon distance of prism that light passes through), shape (unknown cause, possibly interactions that take place outside my frame of reference, and then relayed at a later time, to a different reflected form within the mirror structures, one such form of which I am), and causality (passage of varying physical forces, through various physical mediums, in various physical times, upon various exponent forms). I suspect the operation of the mirror is by means of a copying of the thing seen by the mirror, followed by a transmission of the mirror and its contents to another mirror, while retaining a copy for the initial mirror, then a return transmission from the second mirror to the first mirror. Angling the mirror such that the person standing between them is not blocking the excedent angle of transmission from mirror one allows the entrapment of the person within the mirrors one and two, while also trapping mirror one within mirror two, and subsequently trapping [mirror one within mirror two] within mirror one, and somehow, if I can get my mind around it, trapping [mirror two within mirror one] within mirror two, (and so on and so forth). From what my eyes tell me, the rate of transfer is faster than I am able to sense, however I see that the growth of the number of verses is:

[

1.

1 Person

z

2.

1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

z + R1(z)

3.?

1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z)

OR

1 Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

z + R2(z) + R1(z)

OR

Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R1(R2(z)) + R2(R1(z))

OR

Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z))

4.?

1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z) + R1.1(R2(R1(z))) + R2.1(R1(R2(z)))

OR

1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror 1 Reflection of Person + One Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(R1(z))) + R2.1(R1(R2(z)))

OR

1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One ++ 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror 1 Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror 2 Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person ++ 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(z) ++ (R2(R1(z)))) + R2.1(R1(z) ++ (R1(R2(z))) … (ow my brain, I give up, please help)

5.? 1 Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One Reflection of Person + 1 Mirror One Reflection of 1 Mirror Two Reflection of 1 Mirror One + … (ow my brain, I give up, please help)

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R3(R2(R1(z))) + (make it stop, please, selves and all superiors, what is going wrong?)

]

I’m primarily concerned with conservation of mass wicking away the strength and size and resources of the constituents of existence. I am primarily concerned with excess forms making me relatively less significant in relation to the rest of existence in terms of population, size, color, shape, causal/effectual events, and so on).

The scale of the size changes in sequential reflections is smaller, when reflecting off of a concave shape, and larger, when reflecting off of a convex shape. There also WAS a right/left symmetry reversal on subsequent reflections, for most of my life, but this has ceased to be the case, and I don’t know why. It’s disorienting. In the functions listed, a “+” indicates a presence of two forms of the person and their reflection within a single moment. A “++” indicates a presence of two within a single mirror. Due to passage of time, a person can be subjected to different incident forces and lose symmetry and causality. As such, the equations are listed in ORDER OF CREATION. From the functions, we can see that either mirror one reflected first, or mirror two reflected first, depending on which appears first in the sequence of terms.

I am unable to verify whether 3. should be:

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z))

OR

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)

due to the fact that I have two eyes on the front of my face, and the eyes need to be more numerous and radially arrayed (unwise), or the mirrors moved to be simultaneously visible (unwise), and due to the spherical nature of my eyeballs, as only seen in a mirror, conveniently enough, I can postulate that my eyes are not able to discern fraternal mirrors, as the incident light only registers when it bisects the pupil within the cornea. I do not believe I am being subjected to experiential sensation of fraternal doubles, quadruples, etc., of forms that are cast outside this unidimentional ray. For some reason, there seems to be a strong sensation of “primary mirror”, and “secondary mirror,” and I am uncertain whether this is an effect of which mirror I look at first, or the distance between the mirrors and myself.

This has led to an inability to properly gauge the rate of growth of forms, from 3.?, and onwards, hence the “?”. I would need to have a visual indicator distinguishing between a reflection, and a reflection of a reflection, perhaps [ [ [ light intensity reading ] on a spectrum of [ brightest to dimmest ] ] in order to sense [ [ insidedness <> outsidedness ] or maybe [ outsidedness <> insidedness] ] ], and [ [ [color shade reading] on a permutation of [ Red, Blue, Yellow, who knows any more? ] ] in order to distinguish between [fraternity] of two reflections], in such a way that light intensity and color shade are simultaneously sensed by the viewer, so as to scertain the difference between:
[

[ brightest [ bright [ dim [dimmest ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest [ dim [ bright [ brightest ] ] ] ]

]

AND

[

[ Yellow [ [ Red ] [ Blue ] ] ]

OR

[ Yellow [ [ Blue ] [ Red ] ] ]

OR

[ Red [ [ Yellow ] [ Blue ] ] ]

OR

[ Red [ [ Blue ] [ Yellow ] ] ]

OR

[ Blue [ [ Yellow ] [ Red ] ] ]

OR

[ Blue [ [ Red ] [ Yellow ] ] ]

]

LEADING TO

[ brightest Yellow [ bright/dim YellowRed [ [dimmest Orange1] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [ bright/dim YellowBlue [ dimmest Green1 ] [ dimmest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Yellow [ dim/bright YellowRed [ [brightest Orange1] [ brightest Orange2 ] ] [dim/bright YellowBlue [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ brightest Red [ bright/dim RedYellow [ [ dimmest Orange1 ] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [ bright/dim RedBlue [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Red [ dim/bright RedYellow [ [ brightest Orange1] [ brightest Orange2 ] ] [dim/bright RedBlue [ brightest Purle1] [ brightest Purple2] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ brightest Blue [ bright/dim BlueYellow [ [dimmest Green1 ] [ dimmest Green2 ] ] [bright/dim BlueRed [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Blue [ dim BlueYellow [ [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2 ] ] [dim BlueRed [ brightest Purle1 ] [ brightest Purple2] ] ] ] ]

[ brightest Yellow [ bright YellowRed [ [ dimmest Orange1 ] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [bright YellowBlue [ dimmest Green1 ] [ dimmest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Yellow [ bright YellowRed [ [ brightest Orange1 ] [ brightest Orange2] ] [ bright YellowBlue [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ brightest Red [ bright RedYellow [ [dimmest Orange1 ] [ dimmest Orange2 ] ] [bright RedBlue [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Red [ dim RedYellow [ [brightest Orange1 ] [ brightest Orange2 ] ] [dim RedBlue [ brightest Purle1 ] [ brightest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ brightest Blue [ bright BlueYellow [ [ dimmest Green1 ] [dimmest Green2 ] ] [bright BlueRed [ dimmest Purple1 ] [ dimmest Purple2] ] ] ] ]

OR

[ dimmest Blue [ dim BlueYellow [ [ brightest Green1 ] [ brightest Green2] ] [ dim BlueRed [ brightest Purle1 ] [ brightest Purple2 ] ] ] ] ]

]

Without these optimating tools, I am unable to verify whether 4. should be:

z + R1(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1.1(R2(R1(z)))

OR

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(R1(z))) + R2.1(R1(R2(z)))

OR

z + R1(z) + R2(z) + R2(R1(z)) + R1(R2(z)) + R1.1(R2(z) ++ (R2(R1(z)))) + R2.1(R1(z) ++ (R1(R2(z))) … (ow my brain, I give up, please help)

Work has been stopped until such time as I can acquire accomplices.

What dampens voltage/ergs/energy/enenergy? I was electrocuted a couple of times, once while repairing an antenna/lightGenerator in work study for Andrew Yue, and once while removing the fuse from a strange, beige device in Quantum Mechanics Lab. As a result, my legs are spazming without control, and my mind is suffering.

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.S.: Lenses for the ((tiniest/biggest)&inbetween) = ((Brightest/Dimmest)&inbetween) = ((convexest/concavest)&inbetween) so as to transfer data between forms in mirrors?

March 30 at 5:27am

Remove

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.S.: Lenses for the ((tiniest/biggest)&inbetween) = ((Brightest/Dimmest)&inbetween) = ((convexest/concavest)&inbetween), (priorest/postest)&inbetween, and, in general, (dimentionest/antidimentionist)&inbetween, so as to transfer data between forms in mirrors?

March 30 at 9:05am

Remove

Edits to comments are visible to everyone who can see this comment.

Edit History

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.S.: Lenses for the ((tiniest/biggest)&inbetween) = ((Brightest/Dimmest)&inbetween) = ((convexest/concavest)&inbetween) so as to transfer data between forms in mirrors?

March 30 at 5:27am

Remove

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.S.: Lenses for the ((tiniest/biggest)&inbetween) = ((Brightest/Dimmest)&inbetween) = ((convexest/concavest)&inbetween), (priorest/postest)&inbetween, (dimentionest/antidimentionist)&inbetween, so as to transfer data between forms in mirrors?

March 30 at 9:04am

Remove

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.S.: Lenses for the ((tiniest/biggest)&inbetween) = ((Brightest/Dimmest)&inbetween) = ((convexest/concavest)&inbetween), (priorest/postest)&inbetween, and, in general, (dimentionest/antidimentionist)&inbetween, so as to transfer data between forms in mirrors?

Edit History

Abdullah Russell Hamad https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ck6Hcg2cjk

March 30 at 5:45am

Remove

Abdullah Russell Hamad P.P.P.P.S.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ck6Hcg2cjk

March 30 at 5:50am

Remove

Edits to comments are visible to everyone who can see this comment.

Edit History

Abdullah Russell Hamad [ P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: “undo” is the doubleing necessarytateed (read: necessitated) by [P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.*:**]* ].P.P.P.P.S.:

Post Script a.k.a. P.S. Necessitated by broken timestamps, that do not display sufficient scale, and broken comment nesting, that nest only a single time for each comment. If timestamps are correctly noted down, and comment nesting is further implemented for nesting of comments upon nested comments, it would GREATLY improve readability to 1990s Internet Forum Levels, which was a LONG time ago, and a LOT better than what I/we/us/… are using at this very moment. Edits are hidden, and accountable as Post Scripts, if every possible action commitable adds a new P. after each final P. in a P.S. so as to generate a sequential order of activity. I have never seen an alternative to hiding edits, beyond animating the growth of the corpus with a video, so maybe an edit should leave a copy of the original and introduce the covisual presence of the changed form to the viewer, such that a (prior – “l” a.k.a. “less advanced in action priors, prior – …, prior – 3, prior – 2, prior – 1, prior, present person, post projection, post +1, post + 2, post + 3, post + …, post + “m” a.k.a. “more advanced in action posts”) can all be viewed simultaneously, keeping in mind that in any given moment, a prior may never happen into being a present, given divergent polymentional branches, and a present may never happen into being a post, given divergent polymentional branches.

March 30 at 8:48am

Remove

Abdullah Russell Hamad [ P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.: “undo” is the doubleing necessarytateed (read: necessitated) by [P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.*P.*P.P.S. P.P.P.P.P.P.P[*P*.]P.[*P*.]P.P.P.P.P.P.P.P.S.*:**]* ].P.P.P.P.S.:

Post Script a.k.a. P.S. Necessitated by broken timestamps, that do not display sufficient scale, and broken comment nesting, that nest only a single time for each comment. If timestamps are correctly noted down, and comment nesting is further implemented for nesting of comments upon nested comments, it would GREATLY improve readability to 1990s Internet Forum Levels, which was a LONG time ago, and a LOT better than what I/we/us/… are using at this very moment. Edits are hidden, and accountable as Post Scripts, if every possible action commitable adds a new P. after each final P. in a P.S. so as to generate a sequential order of activity. I have never seen an alternative to hiding edits, beyond animating the growth of the corpus with a video, so maybe an edit should leave a copy of the original and introduce the covisual presence of the changed form to the viewer, such that a (prior – “l” a.k.a. “less advanced in action priors”, prior – …, prior – 3, prior – 2, prior – 1, prior, present person, post projection, post +1, post + 2, post + 3, post + …, post + “m” a.k.a. “more advanced in action posts”) can all be viewed simultaneously, keeping in mind that in any given moment, a prior may never happen into being a present, given divergent polymentional branches, and a present may never happen into being a post, given divergent polymentional branches.

March 30 at 8:50am

Remove

Edits to comments are visible to everyone who can see this comment.